Matthew Dylan Lieberman
lieber@ucla.edu
 

Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Franz Hall
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563

(310) 206-4050


EDUCATION

 
Postdoctural fellow, Cognitive neuroscience, 1999-2000, University of California at Los Angeles, CA
Postdoctural fellow, Social psychology, Spring 1999, Harvard University, MA
Ph.D, Social psychology, 1998, Harvard University, MA
A.M., Social Psychology (minor in Cognitive Neuroscience), 1996, Harvard University, MA
B.A., magna cum laude and departmental honors, Philosophy and Psychology, 1992, Rutgers College, NJ
 
CURRENT GRANTS

            $150,000 "The Role of the Basal Ganglia in Automatic Social Inference"  McDonnell-Pew Cognitive Neuroscience Grant
                (JSMF 99-25 CN-QUA.05), 1999-2002

             $  98,013 "Fast or Slow, High or Low, Stop or Go:  The Neural Basis of Three Basic Dichotomies of Social Cognition"
                National Science Foundation Small Grant for Exploratory Research, 2000-2001 (with Barbara Knowlton)
 

OTHER GRANTS AND AWARDS

PAPERS
 
Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 109-137. ABSTRACT

Lieberman, M. (in press). Introversion and working memory: Central executive differences. Personality and Individual Differences. ABSTRACT

Lieberman, M., Ochsner, K., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (in revision). Do amnesics exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction?  The role of explicit memory and attention in attitude change. Submitted to Psychological Science. ABSTRACT

Lieberman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (under review). Why introverts can't always tell who likes them: Social multi-tasking and nonverbal decoding. Submitted to Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ABSTRACT

Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (in preparation). Inference from behavior:  Reflexive and reflective processes. To appear in M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34)

Lieberman, M. D. & Knowlton, B. J. (in press).  Habit learning and the basal ganglia.  To appear in L. R. Squire & D. L. Schacter (Eds.) The Neuropsychology of Memory (3rd Ed.)

Gilbert, D. T. & Lieberman, M. D. (in preparation). Do we know the ties that bond us?  Foregiveness and affective forecasting. To be submitted to Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Ochsner, K. & Lieberman, M. (under review). Social cognitive neuroscience. Submitted to American Psychologist.
 
 

PRESENTATIONS  
Lieberman, M. D., Knowlton, B. J., & Savoy, R. (2000).  A functional MRI study of artificial grammar learning. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.

Lieberman, M. D. (1999). Synthetic happiness: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Invited talk at the 2d annual Mind, Brain, and Behavior conference, March 1999, Harvard Medical School.

Lieberman, M., & Gilbert, D. T. (1998). The role of affective forecasting in mis-predictions of forgiveness. Poster presented at the 10th annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, May 1998, Washington DC.

Lieberman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1998). Extravert Decoding Advantage? Social multi-tasking and nonverbal communication. Poster accepted for presentation at the 106th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 1998, San Francisco.

Gilbert, D. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (1999).  Mispredicting forgiveness.  Paper presented at the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, October 16, 1999, St. Louis.

Ochsner, K. N., Lieberman, M. D., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2000). Attitude change in amnesia: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.

Puccinelli, N., Ambady, N., Lieberman, M., & Fernandez, S. (1996). Implicit causality and gender in language. Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, July 1, 1996, San Francisco.

Yen, H., Madon, S., Jussim, L., Lieberman, M., Leon, S., and Mennona, P. (1993). Reactions to interpersonal evaluative feedback. Paper presented at the 101st annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 20, 1993, Toronto, Ontario.
 
 
 
 

CURRENT RESEARCH:
Processing goals and amygdala activation in response to outgroups:  An fMRI study.  Hart et al. (1999) found that the amygdala is activated in response to outgroup faces.  The amygdala is associated with an automatic fear response.  Hariri, Bookheimer and Mazziotta (2000) found that the amygdala fear response can removed by introducing different processing goals.  We are currently examining whether the amygdala response to outgroup faces can be eliminated in the same fashion.  (Hariri, Lieberman & Bookheimer)

An fMRI study of implicit learning. Examining the role of the basal ganglia in artificial grammar learning using a single trial fMRI study. The data have been collected and are currently being analyzed. (Lieberman, Knowlton & Savoy)

An fMRI study of the four elementary forms of human relations.  Examining which neural structures and cognitive processes are activated when each relational model is being applied.  We hope that reveal differences in the extent to which the different models draw on positive affect, negative affect, deliberative thought and automatic processes.  (Fiske, Lieberman & Knowlton)

Culture, attribution and cognitive busyness. Cross cultural research generally assumes that individuals from interdependent cultures show a diminished correspondence bias in their attributions. There are two possible reasons for this difference from our culture. Individuals from interdependent cultures might be automatically predisposed to take situational information into account. Alternatively, they might make a greater conscious effort to correct their initial attributions to take the situation into account. We have used the cognitive busyness paradigm with subjects from Japan and America and have found no cross cultural differences in the automatic component of the attribution process suggesting that an attenuated correspondence bias is the result of effortful process (Lieberman & Gilbert)

Is it the thought that counts? We often don't ask others to treat us differently even if we wish they would because we believe that intention is central to the value of a behavior. If the new behavior is extrinsicially motivated we believed it will be experienced by the recipient as inauthentic. In experience, however, we predict that the behavior is what really drives our reactions because (a) immediate affective responses are prior to consideration of intention and (b) to the extent that one does consider intention, we will often still come to the conclusion that the new behavior was intrinsically motivated because of the correspondence bias. (Lieberman & Gilbert)

Stereotype activation after extended interaction: The moderating role of explicit prejudice in implicit stereotype maintenance. Recent studies on the controllability of stereotyping have examined whether our conscious desire not to stereotype can prevent automatic stereotype activation. The current study examines stereotype activation in an actual interaction between a white subject and a black confederate. I hypothesize that explicit prejudice will not predict stereotype activate early in the interaction (1 min), but will predict activation later in the interaction (7 min). (Lieberman)

Categorization vs. Evaluation:  Unravelling a chicken and egg problem.  Zajonc suggested that preferences need no inferences and it is clear that the amygdala codes implicit evaluations before information ever reaches the prefrontal cortex where inferential "work" happens.  The problem is that this inferential work is conscious and Zajonc's research has not considered the possibility that there are implicit categorizations prior to implicit evaluation.  The current research examines whether the time between prime and target can be shorter for prime-target pairs that are categorically linked (black-->athletic) than pairs that are evaluatively linked (black-->bad).  Neurobiological research (Gabriel, 1993) suggests this implicit categorization might be coded in the thalamus.

Cognitive dissonance and self-regulation.  In this study, subjects were primed with either a prevention or promotion focus (Higgins).  During the free choice procedure, subjects with a promotion focus tended to increase their preference for the undesirable, but selected, art print relative to those with a prevention focus  who tended to decrease their preference for the desirable, but rejected, art print. (Ochsner & Lieberman) (Ochsner & Lieberman)
 
 

RESEARCH AND RELEVANT WORK EXPERIENCE: TEACHING AND ADVISING EXPERIENCE:
 
 

DEPARTMENTAL DEVELOPMENT AND UNDERGRADUATE ADVISING:

UNDERGRADUATE ACTIVITIES:
Back to Matt's Home Page